WHAT IS FARM BILL?
The Indian farm
reforms of 2020 refer to three agricultural bills passed by
the Parliament of India on 27 September 2020. The bills collectively seek to
provide farmers with multiple marketing channels and provide a legal framework
for farmers to enter into pre-arranged contracts among other things.
The three laws are
1.
The Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act,
2.
The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and
Farm Services Act, and
3.
the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act,
which came into effect following the approval of
President Ram Nath Kovind.
Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020
This
act allows farmers to engage in trade of their agricultural produce outside the
physical markets notified under various state Agricultural Produce Marketing
Committee laws (APMC acts). Also known as the ‘APMC Bypass Bill’, it will
override all the state-level APMC acts.
·
Promotes the scope of trade areas of
farmers produce from select areas to "any place of production, collection,
aggregation".
·
Promotes electronic trading and
e-commerce of scheduled farmers' produce, Direct an online trading of produce,
establish such a platform includes companies, partnership firms or societies.
·
Allow farmers the freedom to trade
anywhere outside state notified APMC market and this includes allowing trade at
farm gates, warehouses, cold storage and so on.
·
prohibits state governments from levying
any market fee, cess or levy on farmers, traders, and electronic trading
platforms for trade of farmers’ produce conducted in an ‘outside trade area’.
Farmers (Empowerment
and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020
The
acts seeks to provide farmers with a framework to engage in contract farming,
where farmers can enter into a direct agreement with a buyer (before sowing
season) to sell the produce to them at pre-determined prices.
·
provides a legal framework for farmers
to enter into pre-arranged contracts with buyers including mention of pricing.
·
Provides for setting up farming
agreements between farmers and sponsors. Any third parties involved in the
transaction will have tobe explicity mentioned in agreement. Agreements can
cover supply, quality, standard, price as well as farm service. These includes
supply of seeds, feed, fodder, agro-chemicals, machinery and technologies and
other farming inputs.
·
defines a dispute resolution mechanism,
purchase price of farming produce, including the methods of detrming price,
maybe added in agreement. In the case the price is subjected to variation, the
agreement must include a garentee price tobe paid as well as clear reference for
any additional amount of famner may receive like bonous or premium.
·
In case of seed production, sponsors are
required to pay at least two-thirds of the agreed amount at the time of
delivery, and the remaining amount to be paid after due certification within 30
days of date of delivery. Regarding all other cases, the entire amount must be
paid at the time of delivery and a receipt slip must be issued with the details
of the sale.
·
Produce generated under farming
agreements are exempt from any state acts aimed at regulating the sale and
purchase of farming produce, therefore leaving no room for states to impose
MSPs on such produce. Such agreements also exempt the sponsor from any
stock-limit obligations applicable under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
Stock-limits are a method of preventing hoarding of agricultural produce.
·
There is no mention of MSP minimum support price that buyers need to
offer to farmers.
Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020
An
amendment to the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, this act seeks to restrict
the powers of the government with respect to production, supply, and
distribution of certain key commodities.
·
removes foodstuff such as cereals,
pulses, potato, onions, edible oilseeds and oils, from the list of essential
commodities, removing stockholding limits on such items except under
"extraordinary circumstances
·
requires that imposition of any stock
limit on agricultural produce be based on price rise.
·
Stock limits on farming produce to be
based on price rise in the market. They
may be imposed only if there is: (i) a 100 percent increase in retail price of
horticultural produce, and (ii) a 50 percent increase in the retail price of
non-perishable agricultural food items. The increase is to be calculated over
the price prevailing during the preceding twelve months, or the average retail
price over the last five years, whichever is lower.
·
The act aims at removing fears of
private investors of regulatory influence in their business operations.
·
Gives freedom to produce, hold, move,
distribute, and supply produce, leading to harnessing private sector/foreign
direct investment in agricultural infrastructure.
GOV. AND FARMERS HAVE THEIR OWN PERSPECTIVE. WHO IS RIGHT?
·
The
government said that the bills would transform the agriculture
sector. It would also raise the farmers' income, the Centre said. Further the
government had also promised double farmers' income by 2022 and the Centre said
that the Bills will make the farmer independent of government controlled
markets and fetch them a better price for their produce.
The farmers have been apprehensive about this Bill. They say that they are apprehensive about getting Minimum Support Price for their produce. They are also concerned about the upper hand of the agri-businesses and big retailers in negotiations.
FARM BILL BENEFITS
· v country's expectations and needs for agriculture.
v The farmer will be attracted to
relatively good crops, and his income will naturally increase if the farmer
grows expensive crops, and he will also support agricultural growth.
v "These bills would also help to
export agriculture." Tomar said that small farmers are about 86 per cent.
"When these farmers manage to know in advance the fixed price of their
produce by some legislation they can do profit farming."
v The Minimum Support Price (MSP) will
not be impacted by these bills and this will help make farmers more advanced.
"The MSP was, the MSP is, and in the future the MSP will continue."
v Through these changes, farmers will
directly link with the major traders and exporters, adding benefit to farming.
"Those bills would bring revolutionary improvements to farmers'
lives."
v Through the bill, the Minister of
Agriculture aims to provide a national structure for agricultural agreements
that will protect and enable farmers to engage with agri-business companies,
processors, wholesalers, exporters or major retailers.
v That bill would bring independence to
the agricultural sector.
v These bills have no effect on the State
APMC Act. "APMC will be in the state, but beyond its periphery, there will
be inter-state trade, and farmers will be able to sell their goods from their field,
home, and elsewhere after the law comes into being."
WHY FARMERS ARE PROTESTING?
Though
'commission agents' of the 'mandis' and states could lose 'commissions' and
'mandi fees' respectively (the main reasons for the current protests), farmers
will get better prices through competition and cost-cutting on transportation.
Farmers unions in Punjab and Haryana say the recent law at the centre will dismantle the MSP system Over time big corporate houses will dictate terms and farmers will end up getting less for their crops, they argue. Farmers fear that with the virtual disbanding of the mandi system, they will not get an assured price for their crops and the “arthiyas” -- commission agents who also pitch in with loans for them -- will be out of business
HOW MSP AFFECTS FARMERS
MSP
is the minimum price paid by the government when it procures any crop from the
farmers. It is announced by the state-run Commission for Agricultural Costs and
Prices (CACP) for more than 22 commodities on an annual basis, after
calculating the cost of cultivation. Food Corporation of India (FCI) -- which
is the main state-run grain procurement agency -- largely buys only paddy and
wheat at these prices. The FCI then sells these foodgrains at highly subsidised
prices to the poor and is thereafter compensated by the government for its
losses.
They
demand is the withdrawal of the three laws which deregulate the sale of their
crops. The farmer unions could also settle for a legal assurance that the MSP
system will continue, ideally through an amendment to the laws.They are also
pressing for the withdrawal of the proposed Electricity (Amendment) Bill 2020,
fearing it will lead to an end to subsidised electricity. Farmers say rules
against stubble burning should also not apply to them.
In
Bihar, APMC (Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee) are not working.There,
the farmers are getting prices lower than that of the announced minimum
price by the government. A table that shows the statistics
This
statistic clearly show that private market prices are 20-25% below. In 2019, while gov announced rs 1815 as
the MSP for farmers but farmers get only 1350 in private market. In 2018, when
MSP for corn was 1700 per quintal, the farmers had got only 800 – 1050 in
private market.
It
is clear how things work in places where state markets are not active players.
No comments:
Post a Comment